United Cherokee Nation
|
Revival of a Nation Nation of Oklahoma a group came together in Convention and revived the 1839 Constitution of the Cherokee. And the reason and the legitimacy of this action by a group of decendants of Citizens of the Cherokee Nation, who are members of the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma by fact of the (CNO) Constitution. Is explained in THIS PIECE written at the time By David Cornsilk. |
| Cherokee
Nation of Oklahoma(CNO) is claiming the name ofthe Cherokee Nation, that is a lie. Their name is by fact of the title of their 1976 Constitution.This Study by an Attorney in the Mankiller era was done, it quite well explains how and why in the legal sense, and very clear that CNO IS BOGUS |
In
1999 Chief Smith began the name change when he put the term Cherokee Nation for (CNO) in different places it wasn't really that noticable because of the subtleness of the operation.What really points up the deception is the publication of the words from the 99 revision of the 1976 Constitution, as if they are Cherokee law, in the following BOGUS publishing |
| Back
during the R O Swimmer, era it is Quite clear that he knew what he had created was not a sovereign Nation. He had a group of Lawyers conduct a study to ascertain exactly what he could and could not do as the CEO of a Sovereignless entity, we found This Page from the study |
To
reiterate Swimmer knew what he had created, a Proffessor of Law at Harvard is writing a book, may be in publication to day have not lookedHe did an tnterview of Swimmer in his own words Swimmer detailed what he had created how and why, be sure and read the footnotes they are as important to the concept of the idea as anything in the Excerpt of Eric Lamont |
| In
1970, there was a Law enacted entitled Principal Chiefs Act, which is Pub. L. 91-495, 84 Stat. 1091, it has been cited in several cases and it imposes the law that an entity of Indians unless reorganized under the Oklahoma Indian Welfare Act of 1935 they are not a sovereign entity and may only promulgate a set of rules for selecting a Chief nothing about a Constitution as explained 1970 Pricipal Chief Act Response |